Archive for July, 2008

Jul 18 2008

ASCE Pipeline Division International Conference

Published by under General

New applications for FOS come about in many ways. Starting more than ten years ago university researchers led the way, but, in recent years, more commercial entities are solving problems using FOS. One example is Durham Geo Slope Indicator (DGSI) in Stone Mountain, Georgia. They’ve earned a solid reputation for providing vibrating wire (and many other technologies) for geotechnical measurements. But for some of their customers with buried pipelines, high EMI conditions made the vibrating wire technology less useful. They recognized that fiber optic strain gages would work well in this environment.

So they coupled their know how for installing and protecting electrical lead wires and sensors to the FOS sensors and have made several installations. The results are impressive. The pipeline owners can resolve much smaller movements in the pipes than ever before, expected lifetime is improved by at least a factor of ten, and installation is about four times faster.

They’ll be exhibiting their new applications at the ASCE Pipeline Division International Conference on July 23-24 in Atlanta. Learn more at the ASCE websiteand Durham Geo’s website

Comments Off

Jul 14 2008

How do FBG sensor interrogators work?

Published by under Instruments

Here are the basics. Light is sent into a fiber and reflects back from the FBG. The reflected light travels back to the instrument’s photo detectors and is compared to wavelength reference artifacts so that the instrument can determine the position of the center wavelength of the FBG. Wavelength information is converted to engineering units, e.g., 1.2 picometers of wavelength shift could correspond to 1 microstrain. The actual translation is given by the gage factor supplied with the FBG sensor.

When more than one FBG is present on a fiber (this is often the case), the instrument will use one of two schemes to discriminate between one FBG and the next. Time division multiplexing (TDM) systems use the known speed of light in the fiber to discern which signal is reflected from which FBG along the fiber path. Theoretically, 100 or more FBGs can be on the same fiber at the same nominal center wavelength.

The most utilized scheme is wavelength division multiplexing, or WDM. WDM FBGs are at distinctly different nominal center wavelengths from their neighbors, and the interrogator uses these unique FBG wavelengths to keep track of which sensor is which. Sensor capacity on each fiber is determined by the range that each sensor will measure and the total spectral range of the instrument. WDM ranges are now very large and can also accommodate more than 100 sensors per fiber.

We (Micron Optics) have chosen the WDM approach for a few reasons.

1) Scanning speed is not a function of the number of sensors, and the scan speed can be up to 2kHz.

2) Swept laser sources are powerful enough to split into four fibers for simultaneous measurement of >300 sensors.

3) FBGs can be highly reflective. This coupled with the high dynamic range of the instrument make the system much more flexible for measurements over tens of kilometers of fiber.

4) WDM is compatible with Micron Optics fast, narrow line, wide range lasers that are stable over time and temperature, and are mechanically robust in environments where they will encounter shock and vibration.

There are other approaches, but they have significant drawbacks:

a) Broadband source, Dispersive element, Diode Array
Limitations: This method cannot achieve the required wavelength measurement repeatability and resolution with commercially available diode arrays. Low broadband source power limits the ultimate needed combination of channel count/sensor capacity and dynamic range/distance to sensors.

b) Broadband source, Optical Spectrum Analyzer/Multi-line wavelength meter
Limitations: Laboratory OSAs are large, slow, expensive, and do not have a wide operating temperature range. Multi-line wavelength meters acquire data at slow speeds only, and are not mechanically robust. Low broadband source power limits the ultimate needed combination of channel count/sensor capacity and dynamic range/distance to sensors.

c. OTDR/TDM systems
Limitations: Low loss budget precludes a solution with the required number of sensors and/or channels, and data acquisition rates scale down with increasing sensor counts. Minimum physical grating spacing limits some applications.

d. External Cavity Tunable Laser, Power Meter, Wavelength Meter
Limitations: External cavity tunable lasers are slow, expensive, and do not have a wide operating temperature range or the required mechanical robustness. The addition of power meters and wavelength meters add to the bulk, complexity, and cost, as well as reduce reliability and speed. Polarization properties of the narrow line lasers may not be an ideal match for all sensing applications.

Tom Graver
Director, Optical Sensing
twgraver@micronoptics.com

3 responses so far

Jul 03 2008

How do FBG sensors work?

Published by under Sensors

FBGs are essentially reflectors built inside the core of an optical fiber. The reflectors are made by permanently altering the refractive index of the core. FBGs are off-the-shelf items today, and can also be made to order to fit particular applications (e.g., many FBGs in an array with irregular spacing on a single fiber).

Each FBG reflects a certain narrow slice of spectrum. Such slices typically have a smooth Gaussian shape. The center (i.e., top) of the reflected Gaussian peak is what is used to make measurements (aka, the “center wavelength”). The center wavelength is a digitally encoded zero point for each sensor — one that doesn’t change with time. This is one fundamental characteristic of FBG sensors that make the technology so valuable for long term monitoring of structures.

A FBG’s peak shifts (to a higher or lower center wavelength) when either the fiber is strained or its temperature changes. When the strain or temperature change is returned to the zero point, so does the sensor reading, i.e., there is no hysteresis.

FBGs are specially packaged to isolate the measurement property of interest. For example, the Micron Optics os3100 strain gage uses a steel carrier to transfer strain from the structure to the FBG, whereas the os4100 temperature gage isolates the FBG from strain. Used together, one can easily collect temperature-compensated strain measurements.

If you’re buying FBGs for your application, consider these specifications:

* FBG length of 10mm, >80% reflectivity, 3dB bandwidth of 0.25nm, 15dB isolation (that’s the “clean” region of the FBG peak), and a tensile strength of 150kpsi. This strength is equivalent to a proof strain of 15,000ue. Stronger and shorter FBGs are available, but you trade other properties to improve these characteristics.

* Also consider fiber coatings. Most fibers and FBGs are coated with acrylate. This dates back to FBG’s telecom roots. Polyimide coatings, however, have a higher temperature tolerance (250 C vs. 80 C for acrylate), and are far superior in transferring strain to the fiber core.

Tom Graver
Director, Optical Sensing
twgraver@micronoptics.com

10 responses so far